|
His contribution
Pope was a master in
the art of poetry. By the application and perfection of heroic couplet in
his writing, Pope became the best poet of his age. His employed heroic
couplets to compose essays and poems, to discuss philosophy and life, to
criticize society and politics, which made his writing direct and compact,
forceful and elegant. In addition, the couplets were written under oral
speech, which made the writing more direct. And also heroic couplet, which
is the symbol of elegant, civilized the vulgarity made it more elegant and
return to the classic literature of European tradition. Pope made poetry
became an effective weapon in fighting all uncivilized vices in the society.
Further, the essayization of poetry enlarged the definition of poetry. That
is besides lyrics, poetry can also be the communicative device between
friends. The oralization of poetry under Pope became a tradition of English
poetry literature. Pope’s followers of this tradition are a lot, such as
Byron, Browning, T.S.Eliot, Auden, Empson, Pound, Moore, etc.
Pope was also at his best in satire. In his poems such
as the Rape of the Lock, under the dress of elegant, Pope mocked at
the vanity world firmly. Under his pen, the court life of that time with its
cards, parties, toilets, lapdogs, tea-drinking, snuff-taking and idle
vanities were vividly floating in front of readers’ eyes.
Pope was good at epigram. Pope was a diligent reader. As
reading huge with a strong memory especially the works of Latin, Greek and
Milton’s and Dryden's, Pope could borrow or adapt the words and expressions
of other writers to fit his own thought properly. Besides, he paid great
patience in elaboration his art. With the minute care of workmanship and
great reading, Pope’s works are well refined in which words are always find
their exact matching of thought. Therefore, he produced many epigrams that
become household sayings; even many people often quote his work without
knowing his work.
However, with the growth of Romanticism, Pope’s poetry was
increasingly seen as outdated and the “Age of Pope” ended. With the growth
of the Romanticism, Pope’s poetry was increasingly seen as artificial;
Coleridge commented that Pope’s thoughts were “translated into the language
of poetry”. Hazlitt called him “the poet not of nature but of art”. And W.
L. Bowles compared his work to “a game of cards”. M. Arnold’s famous
comments, “Dryden and Pope are not classics of our poetry, they are classics
of our prose”, summed up much the 19th century opinion, and it was not until
Leavis and Empson that serious attempt was made to rediscover Pope’s
richness, variety, and complexity in 1930s.

|