英国文学

返回首页

美国文学

课程概述

教师简介

课程学习

学习资源

复习题库

 

his essays<-Ruskin<-essays<-chapter 7<-contents<-position





Essays
     As an art critic, Ruskin expressed his aesthetic principles in Modern Painters. In the first volume of Modern Painters, he not only makes a defense of Turner, but also goes in for high praise of one of Turner’s pictures, “The Slave Ship”. In the third volume, Ruskin shifts from his discussions on truth and Realism in art to the same problem in literature and brings up the topic of “the pathetic fallacy” in poetry. “While nothing could be good or useful, or ultimately pleasurable, which was untrue”, there is “something pleasurable in written poetry, which is nevertheless untrue.” And this “falseness in all our impressions of external things” is characterized by him as “the pathetic fallacy”. In addition, although “the greatest poets do not often admit this kind of falseness,” considered in relation to the interior state of the speaker the pathetic fallacy tells the truths. This idea that the pathetic fallacy effectively conveys truths of man’s inner world makes it fulfill what Ruskin takes to be the role of art, which is to present things, not as they are in themselves— the role of natural science —but “as they appear to mankind. Science studies the relations of things to each other; but art studies only their relations to man: what one thing is to the human eyes and human heart, what it has to say to men, and what it can become to them.” The truth conveyed by the pathetic fallacy is phenomenological truth, the truth of experience, the truth as it appears to the experiencing subject. Citing a line from Dante’s Inferno, he concludes “the spirit of truth must guide us in some sort, even in our enjoyment of fallacy”. Also, he maintains that the greatest art should contain “the greatest number of greatest ideas”, which should have an effect of moral instruction with truth and concern the daily life of common people yet at the same time being inventive. Because of his dislike for the capitalist civilization of his day, Ruskin advocated a return to the arts and crafts of the medieval age. “Life without industry is guilt and industry without art is brutality.”
     Ruskin showed his enthusiasm for the medieval in his two important works on architecture: The Seven Lamps of Architecture and The Stones of Venice. In The Seven Lamps of Architecture, Ruskin makes very strict aesthetic and moral demands upon art and considers great art as dependent on high aesthetic and moral standards in the life of the community that produces it. A more significant manifestation of Ruskin’s medievalism is The Stones of Venice in which Gothic architecture is highly praised.
      Ruskin himself was also a brilliant artist, being good at drawing and painting. Thus, he often wrote out of his own experience in artistic creation. And his rhythmic style of writing also makes him “the apostle of beauty” who helps the reader to see and appreciate the beauty of the world around him.
     Ruskin was the best art critic in the ninetieth century. Rich but generous, he set up the Guild of St. George and gave away his large inherited fortune to philanthropic enterprises. Although his prescription for the social problems was unpractical, his deeds were worthy of admiration. His social and aesthetic thoughts have exerted deep influence on writers and poets, such as Morris, the Pre-Raphaelites, Oscar Wilde and Bernard Shaw.

  previous page                          next page