home contact us previous unit next unit

Objectives
Main points
Antonymy
Types
Characteristics
Use
Exercise
TOP

Unit 18

 

¡ñ¡ñ Antonymy
6.5 Antonymy
¡ñ¡ñ¡ñ Types
¡¡¡¡ 6.5.1 Types of Antonyms
¡¡¡¡Antonymy is concerned with semantic opposition. Antonyms can be defined as words which are opposite in meaning. There are a variety of 'oppositeness'. They can be classified into three major groups.

¡¡¡¡1. Complementaries (contradictory terms). These antonyms truly represent oppositeness of meaning. They are so opposed to each other that they are mutually exclusive and admit no possibility between them. The assertion of one is the denial of the other. In other words, if one of the pair is true, then the other cannot be. For example, an animal is either dead or alive, and there exists no such a case where the animal is both dead and alive (Though figuratively, one can say `In a technical sense he was alive, but for practical purposes he was dead). The same is applicable to present/absent, male/female, boy/girl, true/false, same/different and so on. If something is imperfect, no matter how slight the imperfection, the fact remains that the thing cannot be perfect.
¡¡¡¡Another distinctive feature of this category is that such antonyms are non-gradable. They cannot be used in comparative degrees and do not allow adverbs of intensity like very to qualify them. Take single/married for example. If someone is single, s/he cannot be married. It is incorrect to say *'S/He is very single, or more single, or extremely single.'
¡¡¡¡2. Contraries (Contrary terms). Antonyms of this type are best viewed in terms of a scale running between two poles or extremes. Antonyms such as rich/poor, old/young, big/small represent two points at both ends of the pole. The two opposites are gradable and one exists in comparison with the other. We can say: A man is rich or very rich; one man is richer than the other. Sue's house is big and Mary's house is small; Sue's house is bigger than Mary's. This shows semantic relativity. Sue's house is relatively big, compared with Mary's house. Mary's house may be relatively big now than before, considering the fact that there are fewer people living with her. This is obviously subjective and depends on the speaker's attitude.
As we have already said, antonyms of this kind form part of a scale of values between two poles and can accommodate a middle ground belonging neither to one pole nor to the other as shown below:

More examples are:
¡¡¡¡old, middle-aged, young,
¡¡¡¡open, ajar, close,
¡¡¡¡rich, well-to-do, poor,
¡¡¡¡hot, warm, cool, cold,
¡¡¡¡beautiful, good-looking, plain, ugly.

¡¡¡¡Apart from adjectives, there are verbs like love-hate, and in between we can add attachment, liking, indifference, antipathy, etc.
3. Converses»»Î»·´Òå´Ê (Relative terms). This third type consists of relational opposites such as parent/child, husband/wife, predecessor/successor, employer/employee. The pairs of words indicate such a reciprocal social relationship that one of them cannot be used without suggesting the other. This type also includes reverse terms, which comprise adjectives and adverbs signifying a quality or verbs and nouns signifying an act or state that reverse the quality, action or state of the other. Take sell/buy, give/receive for example. If A sells something to B, then B buys it from A. If B buys something from A, then A sells it to B. Likewise, if A gives a gift to B, then B receives it from A. If B receives a gift from A, then A gives it to B. It is clear that the two words of each pair are interdependent. The following are the features of converses:

¡¡¡¡1) relational:
¡¡¡¡parent-child
¡¡¡¡teacher-pupil
¡¡¡¡employer-employee
¡¡¡¡2) spatial
¡¡¡¡above-below
¡¡¡¡here-there
¡¡¡¡right-left
¡¡¡¡3) reciprocal
¡¡¡¡buy-sell
¡¡¡¡give-receive
¡¡¡¡borrow-lend

¡¡¡¡Some of the relative terms look similar to contradictory terms: man/woman vs husband/wife. Yet they are not the same. There is an absolute opposition between contradictory terms. If the adult is not a man, then the adult must be a woman. In the case of relative terms, the opposition is only relational. What is applicable to contradictory terms may not be applicable to relative terms. We can try testing husband/wife and parent/child using the same rule. If the adult is not husband, the adult must be wife. Or if the person is not parent, the person must be child. Neither holds water.
¡¡¡¡Compare:
¡¡¡¡husband-wife
¡¡¡¡man-woman

¡ñ¡ñ¡ñ Characteristics
¡¡¡¡ 6.5.2 Some of the Characteristics of Antonyms
¡¡¡¡1. Antonyms are classified on the basis of semantic opposition. Words denoting nature, quality or state of things have many antonyms. This accounts for the large number of antonyms among adjectives. Next comes verbs which denote action or activity. Least antonyms are found among nouns which are names of objects, domains, ideas, etc. Many words, though having synonyms, do not find their semantic opposites, for example, read, hit, house, book, power, magazine. Therefore, in a language, there are a great many more synonyms than antonyms.
¡¡¡¡2. A word which has more than one meaning can have more than one antonym. For instance, when fast is used in the sense of 'firm' or 'secure', then the antonym will be loose. When it means 'quick', the antonym will be slow. And when fast means 'pleasure-seeking' or 'wild', the opposite will be sober. Dull also affords good illustration. If the word is used with book or lecture in the sense of 'boring', the antonym is no doubt interesting. In the sentence 'She became dull and silent during the last part of the journey', the antonym is surely lively. The opposite of dull in 'dull weather' can be sunny. 'Dull noise' and 'dull pain' have sharp and acute as their opposite counterparts. In the sentence 'These factors affect both intelligent and dull children', the antonym of dull is obviously intelligent.
¡¡¡¡3. Antonyms differ in semantic inclusion. Pairs of antonyms are seen as marked and unmarked terms respectively. In many pairs we find that one member is more specific than the other and the meaning of the specific is included in that of the general. Take man/woman and dog/bitch for example. In each pair, the second term is more specific than the first. Consider the sentence 'There has been no man on the island.' In this sentence, man signifies 'human being', naturally including woman, but not vice versa. The same is true of the other pair. We can say male/female dog, but we cannot use these adjectives with bitch. Of these pairs, woman and bitch are marked terms and their opposites are the unmarked.
¡¡¡¡The same is true of tall/short, old/young. In each pair, the second term is more restricted in use than the first, e.g.
[36] How tall is his brother?
[37] How short is his brother?
¡¡¡¡Tall covers the meaning of short.
¡¡¡¡Old includes the meaning of young.

¡¡¡¡So far as the meaning is concerned, sentence [36] includes the meaning of [37]. The use of tall does not exclude the possibility of his brother being very short. But sentence [37] is much more restricted in sense and is considered semantically abnormal unless the speaker is particularly interested in the 'shortness' of his brother or curious enough to find out how short his brother is.
¡¡¡¡4. Contrary terms are gradable antonyms, differing in degree of intensity, so each has its own corresponding opposite. For example, hot and warm are synonyms. Their difference lies in intensity. Correspondingly, they each have a different antonym. The opposite of hot is cold and that of warm is cool. We cannot regard cool as the antonym of hot or cold as the antonym of warm. It is the same with poor/rich, destitute/opulent. Their positions cannot be exchanged.
Some words can have two different types of antonyms at the same time, one being the negative and the other opposite, e.g.
¡¡¡¡happy ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡unhappy
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡sad
¡¡¡¡productive ¡¡¡¡unproductive
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡destructive
¡¡¡¡free ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡unfree
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡enslaved
¡ñ¡ñ¡ñ Use
¡¡¡¡ 6.5.3 The Use of Antonyms
¡¡¡¡Antonyms have various practical uses and have long proved helpful and valuable in defining the meanings of words. Take fresh for example. It appears in a number of phrases of the same structure: fresh bread, fresh air, fresh flowers, fresh look, yet it does not have the same meaning in each case. The different shades of meaning are clearly brought out by replacing them with antonyms: stale bread, stuffy air, faded flowers, tired look. The defining feature of antonyms is illustrated also in the following sentence:

[38] Unlike her gregarious sister, Jane is a shy, unsociable person.
(gregarious-unsociable)
Antonyms are useful in enabling us to express economically the opposite of a particular thought, often for the sake of contrast. Many idioms are formed with antonyms. They look neat and pleasant, and sound rhythmic, e.g.
¡¡¡¡rain or shine ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡now or never
¡¡¡¡here and there ¡¡¡¡¡¡thick and thin
¡¡¡¡weal and woe ¡¡¡¡¡¡high and low
¡¡¡¡friend or foe ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡give and take

¡¡¡¡fire and water ¡¡¡¡Ë®»ð
¡¡¡¡heat and cold ¡¡¡¡º®Êð
¡¡¡¡right and left ¡¡¡¡ ×óÓÒ
¡¡¡¡old and new ¡¡¡¡ ÐÂÀÏ
¡¡¡¡heavy and light ¡¡ÇáÖØ
¡¡¡¡sooner or later ¡¡ ³ÙÔç
¡¡¡¡dine and wine ¡¡¡¡³Ô³ÔºÈºÈ
¡¡¡¡old and young ¡¡¡¡ÀÏÀÏÉÙÉÙ

¡¡¡¡Antonyms are often used to form antithesis to achieve emphasis by putting contrasting ideas together. Proverbs and sayings provide us with good examples:
¡¡¡¡Easy come, easy go.
¡¡¡¡More haste, less speed.
¡¡¡¡United we stand, divided we fall.
¡¡¡¡Many great writers are fond of using antonyms to serve their stylistic purpose. Charles Dickens, for example, used antonyms to convey contrasting ideas. The following is an excerpt from his novel A Tale of Two Cities:
¡¡¡¡It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of light, it was the season of darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to heaven, we were all going direct the other way in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.
This is a superb description of the time of the French Revolution, a time full of contradictions, opposing ideas and views, and all possibilities.