Imagine the peaceful
serenity
of a city without cars. Think of downtowns you have known
after midnight when you could hear the knock of footsteps
and the distant rumble
of a night truck. Recall holidays or weekends in a city when
the usual roar of city traffic was replaced by the voices
of children from a nearby park.
Doesn't that scratch
some fleeting
memory?
Humanity
has almost forgotten how cities felt and sounded before the
invasion
of the iron dinosaurs.
We've almost forgotten the joys of the city, forgotten why
we built cities in
the first place. For many of us today, especially
for suburbanized
Americans, the city is a place to flee
― in our cars, naturally.
Specifically,
the urban automobile kills street life, damages the social
fabric
of communities, isolates people, endangers
other street users, spoils
the city's beauty, upsets people with its noise, causes air
pollution, wastes energy and natural resources, and impoverishes
nations.
But damn
automobiles as you will, I suspect that most Americans faced
with a choice between cars and cities would give
up cities. In fact, isn't that what we have actually done
with our flight to the suburbs?
If the American rate of
automobile ownership
becomes the norm
worldwide, we will someday have two or three billion cars.
Can we find enough resources to build these cars? Can we find
the gasoline
to run them? Can we bear the stink,
the noise, the danger and damage? Or is there a better way?
The strongest argument,
which applies to all of us, is not environmental.
Rather, it is a hard fact. The current automobile age is coming
to a rapid halt
within the lifetime of most people under 50 today! Car-free
cities are not a matter of choice to be debated.
They are inevitable.
The sooner we begin to face this truth and prepare for it,
the less traumatic
the change will be. In fact, the car as we know it is a doomed
species. The petroleum-powered automobile cannot be sustained
for more than a few more decades — if that long.
The challenge is to remove
cars and trucks from cities while at the same time improving
mobility
and reducing its total costs. But solution?
The urban automobile can
be replaced only if a better alternative is available. What
would happen if we designed a city to work without any cars?
Would anyone want to live in such a city? Does it make social
and economic sense? Is it possible to be free of the automobile
while keeping the rapid and convenient mobility it once offered?
Public transport can become more attractive than the car for
the average urban user if it addresses three issues: speed,
comfort, and cost.
The city that has never
yielded is Venice. Venice is densely
populated,
yet still wonderfully quiet, open, and livable.
Its canals
and narrow bridges shielded
it from the car. In Venice you can still taste a quality of
European city life that could not be plundered
by the 20th century barbarians
of steel and petroleum.
In the
Third World, public transport is profit-making.
Almost everybody uses it. Although it consumes
a considerable amount of personal income (though still far
less than a private automobile), public transport in these
areas is demand-driven and works well up to the limits of
road capacity.
Somehow, through the smoke
of the media dominated by the
Auto Axis, we Americans should at least begin debating
the inevitable death of our beloved
automobiles. The advent of the Post-Petroleum Age is going
to be massively
disruptive
if it comes upon us quickly and we are unprepared. In that
worst-case scenario,
most American cities and suburbs could quickly become virtually
inoperable
nightmares for a decade or longer.
The post-automotive
world is not something most Americans want, but the world
cannot avoid it. When traffic finally dies here, many Americans
will recall those "good old days" of traffic jams.
Bottom line: few Americans
will ever see this challenging message. This means that the
Post-Petroleum Age is likely to arrive as a great
surprise to us. The concept of car-free cities will still
be foreign to Americans when cars begin sputtering
to a halt. Not a pretty picture.
(704 words)
↑TOP
|